Splicetoday

Politics & Media
Feb 27, 2015, 01:57PM

Walker’s a Top-Tier Candidate. Now What?

Daniel Henninger cuts through the GOP carnival bombast.

Scottwalker.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

So far this year, in the conservative press, The Wall Street Journal’s Daniel Henninger stands alone in recognizing that while the Republican presidential free-for-all is entertaining, at least in the early going not a single candidate has articulated a coherent strategy to resuscitate the United States once Barack Obama’s tenure mercifully ends. Henninger wrote on Thursday that there’s “something a little off about the Republican presidential conversation right now… What one sees is mainly money and marketing. When does that stop and something more identifiably presidential begin?” There have been other junctures in American history when a presidential election is more important than others—1979 comes to mind, when Jimmy Carter was gasping in White House quicksand—but in the modern era, when politics is marginalized by the mass media’s scoop-a-minute obsession, the consequences of who replaces Obama is largely lost. No matter who wins, pundits and reporters, after a brief intermission for handicapping Cabinet posts in December, 2016, will then hunker down for the 2018 midterms.

It’s likely Henninger is seen as a killjoy, what with the CPAC gathering taking place, twice-weekly polls showing who’s up and down, and the absurd attention given to has-been Rudy Giuliani’s dumb comments about Obama’s lack of patriotism so much easier to chew over than, say, the impossibility of meeting Social Security demands under the current sclerotic system (why the retirement age hasn’t been raised two years is beyond me, and was 15 years ago). Henninger continues that almost all the GOP candidates—in contrast to Hillary Clinton—“couldn’t name three people they’d bring into an administration today.” He says that Jeb Bush has mentioned the names of possible foreign-policy advisers, but at least to me, they’re mostly re-treads from his father and brother’s presidencies, which isn’t a great selling point. James Baker? Isn’t he about 110?

In fairness, it’s easy for partisans of both sides to get caught up in the primary/general election carnival, and I’m certainly guilty of that. I wrote on Feb. 11 that Wisconsin’s Gov. Scott Walker is the GOP’s most formidable candidate—if he survives the smears and legitimate inquiries the media will slash him with—mostly because in contrast to Clinton he’s a middle-class Midwesterner who doesn’t pay lip-service to big issues while eating canapés at Davos. And, as someone who doesn’t want Clinton Redux, the first order of business is identifying a Republican who can defeat the International Hillary Machine. It’s possible Walker can do that—unlike Bush, Rand Paul or God help us, Ted Cruz—but he still needs polish and to learn the definition of the word “nuance.” We know he’s an enemy of unions, a major plus, and a budget hawk. But he’s hazy on foreign policy—and won’t get a pass on that for long—has waffled on immigration and hasn’t presented a comprehensive platform on tax reform. It’s true that Walker hasn’t even officially declared his candidacy, but the rules have changed from when Bill Clinton ran in ’92 and was able to get by with vague ideas.

Henninger outlines the urgency: “The task that Barack Obama is dumping on the next U.S. president, of either party, is overwhelming. Here’s the job description: Needed, a U.S. president able to confront a world in chaos, rebuild shattered alliances, revive the country’s demoralized intelligence services and senior officer corps, manage foreign and domestic demands with a budget that will be drained for years by fantastically expensive debt servicing…” Mind you, Henninger’s no Hillary fan, ridiculing her promise to “crack every last glass ceiling” as an issue that “dates back to… 1984. It may be even older than ‘income inequality.’”

Walker took some heat Thursday for comparing angry protesters in Wisconsin to ISIS, a snippet of hyperbole—although it shouldn’t be lost on voters that the Governor has, unlike the other contenders, battled through three vicious elections in four years, at least proving his resolve—that one would assume advisers will counsel against. He doesn’t have to be an immediate expert on foreign policy—the bar is low by Obama standards—but can’t be ridiculous. A six-day trip to the Mideast, with as little fanfare and no press conferences, makes sense.

The best course for Walker, even in the spring of 2015, is to release a concrete set of policy positions: I’d like to see him advocate a flat tax, but failing that, an explanation of simplifying the tax code, eliminating loopholes for corporations and the extremely wealthy (it’s not like conservative men and women in business will bolt for Hillary; they’ll adapt), and relief for the middle class. He needn’t dwell on immigration—it’s not high on the list of voter concerns—but ought to distance himself from the Party’s xenophobes. Walker’s an evangelical Christian, but in reaching for centrist voters, it’s better to keep that in the background, and leave moral issues to Rick Santorum. And while it’s a stretch, Walker could break out of character and take at least a modified stance on marijuana legalization, saying that it’s up to individual states to make that decision.

Walker’s smart to follow Reagan’s fabled “11th Commandment” of not gratuitously attacking fellow Republicans, which might help him in the debates, and, if he survives the initial cut, bring early drop-outs into his camp.

—Follow Russ Smith on Twitter: @MUGGER1955   

Discussion
  • Comparing protestors to ISIS terrorists is beyond the pale and reveals what sort of person he is. No real American would let that "slip" without believing in his heart the protestors are anywhere close to terrorists. I'm glad he's drawing that line early and i hope he makes the point again, so people know how to vote.

    Responses to this comment
  • Nicky, I think you mean no "true" American would let that slip.

    Responses to this comment
  • Yeah. 'cuz true Americans have no problem with death threats toward his kids and a threat to gut his wife like a deer. I believe he was making the point that he won and they lost. The techniques may be different, but he was neither panicked nor did he acquiesce.

    Responses to this comment
  • Walker is toast. He has peeked too early and is an empty suit. His only claim to fame (as opposed to infamy) is winning a few elections in a small state. He was grossly over-funded by outside groups and barely won even thought he had over 2:1 $ advantage. My dark horse money is split between Romney and Pence. They just both need to lay low until the race truly begins. Look at what happened to Repubs in 2012 when they started running in late 10/early 11

    Responses to this comment
  • Tex: are you related to Pence? That's been your drumbeat for almost a year. He's not running. And any thoughts of late candidates entering the race can be dashed: it's not 1968. I don't agree with Walker on everything, certainly, and he may flame out, but he's no Rick Perry or Pawlenty. Sure, he got a lot of out of state money in his 2012 recall election and reelection last year. But his opponents did as well. The recall was a de facto national race, which is why he's decently vetted.

    Responses to this comment
  • I'm not a Pence fan myself just think he is playing a smarter long term game for presidency than Walker. Last election, everyone who ran early had a short time as the leader then got knocked out by their own over-exposure/stupidity. Perry, Santorum, Newt, Bachman, Trump, etc. Why anyone thinks Walker is different is beyond me. He compares handling ISIS to teacher unions. He won't say if he believes in evolution. His job creation record is horrendous (even by his own set of standards) His lack of higher education is cute now but will destroy him later if he is still around and he is taking on his state's beloved Packers which will destroy his home polling. He has no policy positions because he has never had policy positions, just anti-union rhetoric and other bromides of the conservative wing. Other than winning a few elections that were low-turnout affairs (far from a de facto national race), what has he accomplished that makes you think he can last another 1.75 years under the microscope considering his rough start? I can't wait to hear his position on vaccines

    Responses to this comment
  • What is any governor of any midwestern state expected to have accomplished outside his state up to now? He has made many conservative reforms in Wisconsin that will have a dramatic and positive impact on the state for years to come. And you have to remember-there is nothing in the political makeup of Wisconsin that would give any Republican a reason to think it was possible to win 3 elections in 4 years, much less with the huge national union attention the race got. Texan, you may end up being right about Walker, but it's way too early to count him out yet.

    Responses to this comment
  • Which reforms are you referring to? Wisconsin is in the lowest quartile for many of the objective measures when compared to other state recoveries. In fact, Walker is a lot like Christie. He gets a lot of credit and praise until people actually look at the state of the state.

    Responses to this comment
  • So the union reforms he has led there are nothing? The state of Wisconsin is still not in the best of shape for sure, but he has had 4 years to reverse the policies of many liberal governors. The changes in union policy and the way public employees are dealt with, if left in place, will make the economic future much brighter in Wisconsin. It's ok to think he's not a viable candidate for President - he may in fact turn out not to be. But don't downplay what's he has been able to do under very difficult circumstances.

    Responses to this comment
  • A. I never said his reforms were nothing. B.The changes in union policy has coincided with a decline in school performance (teachers union busted), higher crime reported in major cities (weakened police unions) and major issue with the firefighters (union laws also weakened for this category) I'm not claiming a causation here but there certainly is a high correlation. So please, tell me what reforms he has made that have improved Wisconsin and try to support with evidence. Otherwise I'll stick with calling him the Midwestern version of Christie. P.S. I love union busting. I just don't endorse it when there is no follow up policy to effect positive transition. Busting teacher unions and then leaving the schools to fend for themselves helps no one as is evidenced in Wisconsin

    Responses to this comment
  • I believe Walker didn't mess with police and firefighter unions. They're not weakened. The real issue is that Walker has this huge stash of money, millions and millions of dollars, which he won't let the schools have because he's a big meanie.

    Responses to this comment
  • If he has a huge stash of money, why is Wisconsin not making its current debt payments?

    Responses to this comment
  • Texan. You should ask his opponents. I was being sarcastic. That's the implication of libs when an executive says there's no more money. "He could do it if he wanted to."

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment