Politics & Media
Sep 24, 2012, 04:32AM

The Church of Obama Will Not Be Denied

The President’s media disciples compete for the most dishonest portrayals of Romney.

Rsz obama christ.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1


Joe Klein had a merry time raising a glass to America’s salt of the earth in his latest Time column, “The Imaginary Candidate,” scorching Mitt Romney for “spending more time [in the past six years] pestering plutocrats for cash than meeting with and listening to the general public.” Marching on orders, Klein leapt on Romney’s still-toxic “47 percent” remark at a supposedly private Boca Raton fundraiser last May, sticking up for the service workers at that affair for “plutocrats” (the favored word of liberal reporters this year). Klein draws a portrait of Romney as William Zantzinger vs. the vast majority of Americans, who are all Hattie Carrolls, and I’d suppose that whoever it is that actually reads Time anymore nodded in furrowed-brow approval.

Klein may be an aging Baby Boomer, but if he ran for the presidency of the dormant and scattershot Occupy Wall Street movement, I suspect he’d win by acclamation.

Yet there’s a foul odor emanating from Klein’s words, one that can’t be excused by his devotion to the Church of Obama. He accuses Romney of running for president in a bubble—fair enough, since the GOP hasn’t tapped a worse candidate since Bob Dole in ’96—but doesn’t recognize that he, Joe Klein, oracle of the masses, a biographer of Woody Guthrie for crying out loud, is just as insulated as Romney. Maybe it’s the crowd he hangs with, or perhaps he’s consumed by following his residuals from his novel (and then film) Primary Colors, but Klein apparently doesn’t realize that he’s just as guilty as he says Romney is for throwing a portion of American citizens off the U.S.S. Affluence. He writes:

Ah, but there’s that cognitive dissonance again: the Romney campaign is running against a phantom economy as well… Members of the public certainly are worried about the inability of the economy to create jobs and especially about the employment problems their children will confront. But let’s face it: if you add up all the unemployed, underemployed and those who’ve abandoned the workforce, you’re still looking at maybe 15% of the labor market. And while the Romney campaign was sleeping, the other 85% have seen their circumstances change. 

So, while Klein blasts Romney for writing off 47 percent of the potential electorate, he chucks a mere 15 percent in the trash. Isn’t that an actionable offense for parishioners of the Church of Obama?

But the demi-plutocrat Klein doesn’t stop there in claiming it’s Morning in America once more. Speaking about “the other 85%,” he says, “The soaring stock market has restored their 401(k)s to their former plentitude; the values of their homes are creeping back above the waterline in some areas and booming in others.” Admittedly, I’m not an economist of Prof. Klein’s expertise, but the financial collapse that began four years ago and wiped out, depending on one’s portfolio, some 50 percent of savings, haven’t been across the board made whole by the market’s gains. Klein discounts the fact that so many Americans, devastated by the post-Lehman economy, had to dip into their compromised capital, and so no matter how far the Dow has jumped, a return to late-2007 levels hasn’t occurred for one and all.

Klein digs a deeper hole: “Our nation’s feckless freeloaders have behaved responsibly since the 2008 crash… They’re feeling better about their circumstances. And suddenly, the percentage of people who think the nation is on the right track is surging…” Klein presents no evidence of this surge, but the National Journal’s Charlie Cook, citing the most recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll (which Cook says contains “modestly good news” for Obama, and the opposite for Romney) points out that the “right track” number has increased from 32 percent in August to 39 percent when the poll was conducted. The “wrong track,” while reduced, is at 55 percent, a number that Cook says isn’t a “big change” but still favorable for Obama.

Let me be clear: Romney’s campaign is muddled and he’s likely to lose on Nov. 6. After he tapped Paul Ryan as his running mate in August, I thought Romney had finally become assertive, and figured he had about a 45 percent chance of defeating Obama; with his recent travails, and continuing lack of defining what exactly he’d do to improve the economy, I guess his chances now are about 33 percent. Just a gut hunch, and given this most unusual election, it could tick up or down in just days, but Romney’s not in great shape.

But the media’s caricature of Romney as an avaricious and heartless man who’d make Donald Trump look like Phillip Berrigan is demeaning not only to the candidate but also says a lot about today’s legacy media. Klein’s a master practitioner of Democratic propaganda, but his confederates are equally misleading. Last week, The Washington Post’s E.J. Dionne’s column was headlined, “Does Romney dislike America?” and though the pundit didn’t say explicitly that Romney hates most of his countrymen, he used the words of another Republican, which urged generosity of spirit, as advice to “Boca Raton Mitt Romney.” And that Republican would be… George W. Bush.

When Obama’s enablers in the press invoke Bush to slam Romney, well, that’s just plain dizzying.

—Follow me on Twitter: @MUGGER1955

  • Not sure how much you can blame the disciples when Romney makes it soooo easy. " I'm not worried about the poor" "I like sport"; "Some of my good friends own Nascar teams" etc.

    Responses to this comment
  • I agree with Texan; it's mostly been Romney himself who's portrayed himself as a heartless and clueless plutocrat, it seems like. The 47% remarks are pretty thoroughly damning...and taking Paul Ryan as his running mate says pretty clearly that he's running on austerity and tax cuts, which is a hugely unpopular program (for good reason). His only other solid policy proposal is to repeal Obamacare...but he's got no other health care plan to put in place.//I mean, you're not even making an argument *for* Romney here; you're just saying that the press sucks. Which may well be the case...but it doesn't exactly constitute a stirring defense of Romney.

    Responses to this comment
  • It's not a defense of Romney, who's an awful candidate. Rather, just pointing out the overkill of Obama's media admirers. Don't you think it's odd that Joe Klein dismisses 15% of the population?

    Responses to this comment
  • I mean, I have no need or desire to defend Joe Klein. It sounds from the quote like he's talking horse race rather than saying that we shouldn't pay attention to the unemployed, but he still comes across as callous. I think pointing that out is fair enough.// When I've seen Obama talk about the 47%, he's always pretty careful to say that as President he feels responsible for the entire electorate, not just the people who voted for or will vote for him.

    Responses to this comment
  • You write a column that repeatedly refers to "The Church of Obama"--whatever that means--but you only mention one member, Joe Klein.If you think Joe Klein is an idiot and in the bag for Obama, write that. If you think that the media as a whole is in the bag for Obama, write that. If you write about the Church of Obama, explain what you mean.

    Responses to this comment
  • I guess you didn't read to the end, where EJ Dionne is cited as a fellow Obama enabler. If you can't figure out what the Church of Obama means, well, that's just surprising.

    Responses to this comment
  • I understand exactly what you think it is. Excuse me if I didn't get quite to the end, but I'm not that interested in Joe Klein. The point is that you implicitly are raising is a bigger point about Obama-enablement. But you raise it and don't deal with it. Few people gives a damn about what Joe Klein thinks. The big question is whether the media is enabling Obama and denigrating Romney unfairly. That's the real question--and one that you raise yourself with The Church of Obama nonsense. Deal with that question, not Joe Klein. I read another post at this site that was 90 percent based on what Peggy Noonan said. It's a waste of time. Deal with real issues.

    Responses to this comment
  • It's kind of fun to kick Joe Klein though...for example, the idea that everyone who is unemployed isn't going to vote for Obama is goofy. I'm pretty sure that Obama probably does better among the poorest part of the electorate than he does among people further up the income ladder.//I think Romney's gaffe (and the thing Klein isn't picking up on) is in part based on the fact that Republicans at this point just really wish the electorate was smaller; the more people vote, the worse they do. That's a bad position to be in as a political party, both just in itself and because, obviously, it's pretty terrible as messaging.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment