Splicetoday

Politics & Media
Feb 08, 2012, 10:32AM

Obama is Incapable of Gaffes, Or So the Liberal Media Believes

A double standard? Nah, just political business as usual.

187858 president obama tells congress to pass the.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

It’s extraordinarily difficult to be surprised by the mainstream media’s flagrant obeisance to Barack Obama—Jeremiah Wright seems like a decade ago—but I shook my head in disgust earlier this week after the President made an especially arrogant remark during an interview with Today’s Matt Lauer. Obama said, “I deserve a second term but we’re not done.” Apparently the Campaigner-in-Chief is, unlike Mitt Romney or Joe Biden or Newt Gingrich—men who provide a bundle of mirth and derision for political reporters and pundits—constitutionally unable to leave a verbal mess on the floor.

Think about what Obama said: “I deserve a second term.” Americans can, and will, decide whether or not that’s true, but the President’s sense of entitlement certainly rivals that what Romney is accused of every day. Had Obama, mindful of political manners, said, “I believe I’ve earned a second term, but, you know, Matt, that’s a decision voters will make in November,” no one could complain. But “deserve”? Shucks, I could tell family and colleagues that I “deserve” a best-selling book, say, or better eyesight, a Lotto jackpot or a map leading me to the Fountain of Youth. Such brio would be met by laughter, or scorn, and it’d be, well, deserved.

It goes without saying that had George W. Bush told a TV interviewer in 2004 he “deserved a second term” the liberal media would’ve run with that bit for months. Slate’s Jacob Weisberg, who collected “Bushisms” for several books, might feign outrage and then like a squirrel collecting “wingnuts,” happily point out Bush’s goof to his readers.

But when it comes to Teflon, Obama makes Ronald Reagan look like a whipping boy. It’s true, given the GOP primary disarray, that Obama is the favorite for reelection, absent a Jimmy Carter-like show of weakness overseas, in Syria or Iran, for example, or if the slowly recovering economy reverses course. Nevertheless, despite drawing the long straw with the probable nomination of Mitt Mondale, er, Romney, Obama is doing his best to alienate the 20 percent of Americans who decide elections. There was his incredibly short-sighted—in an election year—decision to alienate Catholics by requiring religious organizations to provide contraception in their insurance plans, or face punitive measures. As The Wall Street Journal’s Gerald Seib pointed out on Feb. 7, “The bigger question is whether rank-and-file Catholics, even the majority who tend to disagree with church teachings on contraception, will view the administration’s actions as a case of overreach.”

Then, to no surprise to those who recognize Obama as a have-it-both-ways pol who can dress in drag as a 99 percenter while shaking down the one percent for campaign donations, the administration announced that like the Republicans, the President will indeed take money, and lots of it, from the evil, greedy and corporate Super Pacs. This has vexed the Occupy Wall Street crowd, but no matter, Obama’s team no doubt believes, since those young activists and nostalgia-seeking Baby Boomers have no choice but to vote for the President. Or stay at home and not be missed, for Obama the cost of doing business. The hypocrisy, from a man who denounces Big Money in politics, is astonishing, at least to rational minds, but that’s of a piece with Obama’s entire presidency.

Discussion
  • Sir, I am reminded of an incident long ago. To set the stage, at that time, most Episcopal clergy were politically liberal while the laity were conservative. (By and large, on both counts, of course.) The President was a Republican, but I can't remember who. The priest giving the sermon dinged the Prez for something. I was standing in the back with another usher, an oldtimer, who said in a very poor approximation to a stage whisper, "That sonofabitch is criticizing our President!" But you have a right, we may thank our stars, so have at him.

    Responses to this comment
  • Certainly it is better than a president who launchers a second war to get re-elected eh?

    Responses to this comment
  • noscull & Rokth, You both confirm the point that Mr. Smith is making. One mistake however: the media's blindness is intentional and agenda-driven - not a "belief"... whereas, you two actually believe this arrogant, empty suit is perfect.

    Responses to this comment
  • Russ, Re deserve a 2d term. I think you are being too harsh. Surely as one of our 4 greatest presidents you wouldn't deny him that.

    Responses to this comment
  • Good point, Oparoberts. I forgot to mention that Obama is creating jobs by putting himself on Mt. Rushmore.

    Responses to this comment
  • Remember the Nobel Peace laureate has authorized drone attacks against his own citizens. Try to imagine the bloodthirsty imagery had GWB done this.

    Responses to this comment
  • Deserves another term. He told us that with his plans unemployment would not exceed 8%. He was wrong, he failed, and failure doesn't deserve another term. He told us that his plan had shovel ready jobs, and then laughed when they weren't there. He bows to other world leaders, something that is decidedly unpresidential He is unpatriotic. This by his own words He said that for running up the debt and leaving that debt to our children that Bush was unpatriotic. So running up more debt in a shorter time frame, he must be held to his own words. He invested in Solyndra, he is where the buck stops with Fast and Furious, he won't let American companies drill, but borrows money from the Chinese to invest in Brazil, so we can be their best customers. He wants to spread the wealth, except for his. But I do give him credit, and all voters should remember he told us that under his plans the cost of energy would skyrocket, and every time I pay a utility bill, or fill my car with gas I am reminded of the promise he kept to the American people, if they would elect him, and wonder why anyone would vote for him again. And then he told us that if he didn't fix the economy in his first term he would be gone. Time to hold him accountable

    Responses to this comment
  • Wow, that's it? That's this large number of gaffes the MSM is allegedly ignoring? A statement where he says he "deserves relection", instead of saying "HE Thinks he deserves reelection", and a policy decision to treat Catholic hospitals like everyone else. I'm not sure if either one is even a gaffe.

    Responses to this comment
  • I do not quite see the logic here. Obama is arrogant because he thinks he should be elected president in 2012. So, what does that make Rmoney, Newt, Santorum and Paul, who endlessly tell us the same thing.

    Responses to this comment
  • During my final interview with Bush in the Oval Office for this book, I asked him directly: "Why do you deserve a second term?

    Responses to this comment
  • Matt Lauer's exact question was, "I think if you go out on the street and ask average Americans, 'Is the recovery done,' overwhelmingly they will tell you, 'It is not.' So, do you deserve a second term?" I think Obama's response to that question of, "I deserve a second term, but we're not done," makes a lot of sense, given the question asked.

    Responses to this comment
  • Second, is this really something that a Republican president wouldn't answer the same way? The article claims that, "It goes without saying that had George W. Bush told a TV interviewer in 2004 he 'deserved a second term' the liberal media would’ve run with that bit for months." If only there were some way to test that theory, and look back in time to how George W. Bush would have answered a similar question and what the media response would have been.

    Responses to this comment
  • During my final interview with Bush in the Oval Office for this book, I asked him directly: "Why do you deserve a second term?

    Responses to this comment
  • That question was from Bill Sammon's book, "Misunderestimated", p. 342. Bush's response: "I deserve a second term because..."

    Responses to this comment
  • I strongly think that Obama deserves a second term

    Responses to this comment
  • Care to elaborate?

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment