In some countries, such as Japan, guns are almost impossible to obtain. In others, like Switzerland, they’re easily purchased, but thought of as just "guns." Here in the United States, we have a unique situation. Guns are freely available, and are a fetish for certain enthusiasts. They’re not merely tools for self-defense. Unlike mere tools, guns in the U.S. evoke deep emotions and patriotic sentiment.
America's gun fetish manifests itself in a number of ways. A certain percentage of American men combine their lust for the female body with a physical attraction to guns. The Twitter "Girls and Guns" account caters to this crowd. Whatever your type (woman, that is) may be, they have it, from the "girl next door" with a hunting rifle to the underwear-clad model pictured with a cache of automatic weapons. There's even women in wedding dresses with weapons, which is a fad nowadays. I'm not sure what turns the viewers on more, the guns or the girls, but the combination of the two probably facilitates moments of exquisite release for a certain kind of "shooter."
A look at the Twitter hashtag "#gunporn" gives you another glimpse into this strange world. It's not tits & ass porn, but rather the firearms equivalent of food porn. Guns are presented as objects of beauty, with photos meant to produce long gazes from the reverent. Every kind of firearm is offered for admiration, from pistols to AR-15s, as well as ammunition. Some photos really make the bullets look beautiful, with their shiny and smooth polished metal surfaces and gracefully curving contours. I wonder if the # gunporn pictures alone—no need for a woman—produce physical arousal in some of the fans. The real question is, how many of these "ammosexuals" are there?
I understand how traditional and food porn work. They both whet appetites for pleasurable acts by providing vicarious thrills. I'm not sure that sort of appetite can be appealed to, however, by tweeting out photos of guns and their accessories. Fetishes appeal to a niche audience. I’ve no understanding, for example, of the piercing fetish and any why pierced people are drawn to each other. Perhaps if I were to go to a gun range and feel the "thrill" of shooting firearms, these pictures would do trick for me.
I can get at least an inkling of why there’s this element of attraction to a physical object by thinking about the sense of power holding a weapon can give people. A feeling of invulnerability is certain emotion, probably attached to the survival instinct. Looking at, or fondling, a Glock would release more endorphins than a more utilitarian tool like a chainsaw, and even though there’s a thrill to using a chainsaw—the noise and vibration—I doubt many wood choppers sit around and moon over photos of a STIHL MS 201 T like gun fetishists might with a Sig Sauer P220 image.
Guns are precious objects to many Americans. So many unusual emotions are attached to firearms that you end up with a legal environment where even 90 percent of those on the FBI's consolidated Terrorist Watchlist can pass a background test to purchase a gun, according to the GAO. What happens is that the FBI gets notified after someone on that list purchases a gun. George W. Bush's administration tried to pass legislation aimed at preventing this, but the NRA led a successful campaign to defeat it, meaning that people who can't fly commercially can still buy a gun.
Even if the legislation that Sen. Dianne Feinstein is trying pass, making it illegal for federally-licensed firearms dealers to sell to someone on a terrorist list that the attorney general would compile, all a terrorist has to do is go to a gun show, where unlicensed individuals can legally sell guns. It's a terrorist's paradise here, and they must think we're really stupid. Ammosexuals are scared to death of terrorists, but terrorists love them. They're actually the best allies a terrorist could hope for.
—Follow Chris Beck on Twitter: @SubBeck
Probably worth checking this out: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/30/the-gun-show-loophole-myth/ Naturally, it is discredited by appearing in the paper we all love to hate. That one got old. As to gun porn: I've seen displays of swords and knives bringing the same awed gaze. Back in the day, I had a peace freak fraternity brother and, just for grins, I handed him a commando knife. "God", he said, "this is beautiful," Never figured the irony. My guess is, from evolutionary psychology and, see Ardrey--Hunting Hypothesis and African Genesis--that we are evolved to appreciate what the nand and wrist tell us is a good tool for its use. And waving get out of VN signs doesn't change that.
Since I never said there was a gun show loophole, not sure why I'd check an article on gun show loopholes.
Your last graf is about what, then?
Not about a loophole.When I discuss loopholes,I use the word "loophole.That's how you'll know.