Why listen to Jawbreaker when you can listen to Green Day? Why listen to Sunny Day Real Estate when you can listen to At the Drive-In? My friend Mike Apichella pointed out on Twitter, “Why listen to Green Day when you can listen to the Buzzcocks? Why listen to At the Drive-In when you can listen to Rites of Spring?” Why listen to The Beatles when you can listen to 16th-century madrigals? Mike has a point though: it’s all a matter of preference. But ever since my brother got me Jawbreaker’s 24 Hour Revenge Therapy for Christmas, I’ve been struggling to find anything this band does that Green Day didn’t do better. The comparison isn’t superficial: both came out of the Bay Area, both were beloved in the underground before being summarily rejected by their hometown of Oakland after signing to major labels. Green Day might’ve been banned from Gilman St., but they made out fine professionally—they became so popular that Maximum Rock ’n’ Roll’s opinion was irrelevant, and Gerard Cosloy’s disapproval was pissing on a wildfire. But Jawbreaker were caught in the middle with 1995’s Dear You, a glossy major label debut that totally stiffed—it was the only CD that DGC never re-pressed, and it became a collector’s item for several years. Newly minted Dookie producer Rob Cavallo took on Jawbreaker’s major label debut, and it sounds phenomenal compared to the anemic and washed-out sound of 24 Hour Revenge Therapy.
Jawbreaker’s Bay Area fans took Dear You as such a betrayal that they sat down at the release show with their backs turned to the band. Just a year after Dookie, the community didn’t want to be burned again. Obviously I wasn’t there, but it all seems so silly in retrospect. Scene politics aside, what virtue is there in bad sound? The guitars on 24 Hour Revenge Therapy just sound weak, and as far as I can tell, there’s nothing this band does that Green Day doesn’t do better. Twenty years ago, I would’ve gotten shot or duped with bad dope on Telegraph Ave. for saying that. Now, “sell out” has exited the lexicon, thank goodness. But after struggling for three months with this Jawbreaker record to get something out of it other than vague memories of the Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater soundtrack, I’ve given up and gone right back to Insomniac. Where Jawbreaker are sloppy and marble-mouthed, Green Day are relentlessly precise and powerful, and before I belabor the point anymore, plenty of people I’ve talked to about this insist I’m insane, that these bands are attempting something completely different, and—nothing against Green Day—but they only wish they could do what Jawbreaker did. Please.
Green Day’s greatest achievement was crippling punk fascism and fulfilling the failed dream of Hüsker Dü, another band caught in the middle, rejected by their fanbase and the mainstream marketplace in the late-1980s. Hüsker Dü might’ve made their most acclaimed records with Spot, one of the worst engineers in history, but there’s plenty to dig in with them: Bob Mould’s crystalline, shimmering, and methedrine-inspired guitar sound, unconventional Byrds-like chordal arrangements and guitar figures, and the bleaker and more subtle vocal melodies. Jawbreaker, and a million other bands that are safe to name-drop, just sound like generic, the off-brand to Green Day or blink-182’s Coca-Cola.
—Follow Nicky Smith on Twitter: @MUGGER1992
Green Day invented Hot Topic. I am forever grateful for that, and I will never diss them.
blink-182 is Green Day-lite, Green Day is Jawbreaker-lite. I will say, this line is brill: "Why listen to The Beatles when you can listen to 16th-century madrigals?"
The "_____ is derivative of _____" argument is old and tired, yes, but at the same time, I think with Jawbreaker, people in the scene felt like the music was made for Them, and when Dear You came out, it seemed like the band was forgetting, and ignoring, the fans that made them successful in the first place. But you know what, that album is not bad. Why listen to Dookie when you can listen to Dear You? Legitimate question.