Moving Pictures
Dec 16, 2015, 07:11AM

It’s Doubtful The Force Awakens Will Be Great

The new film almost demands parodies.

Rsz la et hc star wars the force awakens trailer 20151019.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

Excitement about The Force Awakens has reached ecstatic heights of 24/7 media blaring. Han Solo is back! Princess Leia is old! There are explosions and light sabers and there's going to be lines around the block for months. It's been a full decade since the last Star Wars film, and this one is going to fulfill every hope and dream of long long ago and far far away.

Some critics have seen the film, though reviews are scant due to top-secret security. Maybe they already know that Star Wars: The Force Awakens will live up to all the hype. But it’s a lot more likely that the movie’s a mediocre dud.

The fact is, most Star Wars films have been mediocre duds—or worse. The first film was charming, with its clunky derivative plot, scattershot acting, filth-smeared robots, and wonderful puppeteering. The Empire Strikes Back, thanks to director Irving Kirshner, was, against all the odds, an almost conventionally good film, despite Mark Hamill's hapless whining. The first half of Jedi was a great heist set piece, which dissolved into repulsively cutesy Ewok nonsense by the end.

And then we got three crappy, bloated, directionless prequels. Out of six Star Wars films, only two have been unambiguously good—and those were made a full quarter century ago. At best, that's a 33 percent chance that the new film will be decent. At worst… well, you could say the chance is zip.

Director J.J. Abrams' past work on other franchises isn't exactly encouraging either.  Mission Impossible III (2006) is a competent, soulless genre exercise, with a painfully misguided romance plot. Only Philip Seymour Hoffman as the villain shines, and his unfortunate death means that he couldn't be cast for Star Wars, much as we might all wish he were.

Abrams' first Star Trek (2009) reboot film was similarly forgettable—as in, I've seen it, but remember nothing about it. His second, Into Darkness (2013) was wretched, with a convoluted plot mired in winking series references and giant property destruction set pieces. It was loud, boring, clumsy, and smug—a kind of quintessence of the worst tendencies of fandom.

The trailer for The Force Awakens looks more or less like what you'd expect from a Star Wars trailer. There's vague babbling about the Force, some Darth Vader-looking guy being menacing, various people making ominous gestures because the Force likes ominous gestures, nostalgic glimpses of Harrison Ford, light sabers, space battles with things blowing up, all to a standard issue John Williams score with lots of orchestral fanfare. No Jar-Jar level aesthetic atrocity is visible, but neither is there anything to rival the gleeful futuristic sordidness of the cantina scene.

The determination to avoid spoilers leaves viewers with only snippets of information about plot and characterization, though, to be fair, Star Wars was never especially interested in that anyway. The look of the trailer is slick—which is a welcome relief from the shapeless prequels, but hardly captures the clunky grace of the originals.

In summary, we have a long-played-out franchise helmed by a bad-to-mediocre director who’s produced a predictable but passable trailer. To that, add the fact that, with the possible exception of The Phantom Menace, The Force Awakens is the worst title in a series marred by corny, nonsensical titles. The new film almost demands parodies.

Put it all together and there's no reason to think the film will be great. But everyone is going to line up to see it anyway. The future may always be in motion, but one thing you can predict for sure: whether it's bad or good, The Force Awakens will make a ton of money.

—Follow Noah Berlatsky on Twitter: @hoodedu

  • Wow! A movie review before the reviewer has even seen the movie.

    Responses to this comment
  • it's just a ying to the yang of raving mad hype. i've been feeling the same way. as a fan who unfortunately has to judge films critically, i see friends and mentors losing their minds over something that by all logic should be mediocre, and it's disheartening. the entertainment industry really has fans of all things by their proverbial balls.

    Responses to this comment
  • This was perhaps the stupidest article I have read in weeks. You didn't like any of the Stars Wars movies? You don't like JJ Abrams? Well, gee, I don't know, maybe this movie isn't for you? You write, "Put it all together and there's no reason to think the film will be great." Put what together, your personal biases? Saying this movie will be a "dud" implies consensus, either critical or commercial. What are you trying to do, Noah, troll Star Wars fans? Look man, I don't like Stars Wars, either. In fact, I probably won't even see this movie. But there have been no indications that it will be a "dud."

    Responses to this comment
  • Texan, it's not a review. It's talking about why I don't think it'll be good. Lots of hype about how great it'll be; I'm merely expressing skepticism./mhulsh, as I say in the piece, I quite like the first two films, and parts of the third. There's certainly no indication that it will be a dud at the box office, but early reviews aren't precisely uniformly ecstatic...

    Responses to this comment
  • Seconded, Mhulsh94. Noah, for someone who frequently disparages trolls, this article is pretty trollish. You really don't give the impression that you liked any of the Star Wars movies. You gave backhanded compliments to the first two movies. And now you're saying that "early reviews aren't precisely uniformly ecstatic"? That's just wrong. It's currently at 95% on the Tomatometer, with 191 out of 201 reviews being positive. Regardless of how you feel about Rotten Tomatoes, that kind of score represents critical consensus.

    Responses to this comment
  • That was my point Noah.

    Responses to this comment
  • @Booker Smith Giving the impression that he doesn't like any of the Star Wars movies isn't "trollish" - he probably doesn't! Or at least doesn't much, and why should he? They're not very good. One disagreement with the above piece: Noah says "no Jar-Jar level aesthetic atrocity is visible" like that's a GOOD thing. At least that racist fever dream revealed the hand of a somewhat unusual individual creator. I don't think anybody's ever been able to accuse J. J. Abrams of that.

    Responses to this comment
  • Booker, well, that does seem like critics love it. The reviews I'd heard had been less enthusiastic. Bob Mondello on NPR made it sound pretty crappy, and his was the first I heard. I guess he's an outlier.// I say in the review that the first two movies are good! Not sure what else I'm supposed to say. I can't say they're two of my favorite movies of all time, because I don't.

    Responses to this comment
  • No, Noah, you don't! You condescendingly call the first film "charming," and then give it backhanded compliments. You then say the second film is "an almost conventionally good film." And Mhulsh94 is right, "dud" implies consensus. If you changed your wording a bit, and simply said, "I don't think I'll enjoy the new Star Wars movie," well, fine. As of now, though, you give no legit evidence to back your claim.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment