Aug 28, 2013, 09:29AM

Why Are MLB Broadcasters So Awful?

A monkey could analyze baseball better than Harold Reynolds.

Screen shot 2010 04 27 at 112858 am.png?ixlib=rails 2.1

A few days ago, a friend turned me on to the Twitter account @HeardOnMLBT, which quotes some of the ridiculous things that come out of the mouths of the MLB Tonight anchors, primarily Harold Reynolds and Mitch Williams. A few examples:

•    "I'm not just giving the Braves the title yet... the Nationals are getting really hot!"—Harold Reynolds (The Nats are currently 13 games behind the Braves, with virtually no chance of making the postseason)

•    "I'm tired of going through all these numbers and reading all this stuff. The guy'll be 19-1... give it to him!"—Darryl Hamilton (In regards to why Max Scherzer should win the AL Cy Young)

•    "J.J. Hardy is probably the best all-around shortstop in the game today."—Mitch Williams (Hardy is currently ranked ninth in fWAR amongst all shortstops)

•    "Wainwright has come back from surgery and hasn't been that [ace pitcher]"—John Hart (Wainwright is currently ranked second in fWAR among all pitchers)

Aside from a few laughs, @HeardOnMLBT validates my longtime dislike of sportscasters. Yes, many of these posts are taken out of context, but whether they work for ESPN, FOX, or MLB Network, many of today’s baseball announcers often have no idea what they’re talking about. Obviously, not everyone can be Vin Scully, and I understand that most broadcasts are geared towards casual fans as well, who generally don’t have a wide grasp on advanced statistics, but I also don’t expect a complete dismissal of Sabermetrics, which is, horrifyingly, quite common. A reliance on archaic statistics that have long been phased out of the educated baseball fan’s lexicon, like pitcher wins and the less egregious RBI’s, for example, is just as offensive to me. I’m not demanding that these so-called “experts” constantly comment on BABIP or wOBA, but to have these ratios in the rotation would be nice. The problem is, not only do I doubt that Harold Reynolds knows what BABIP is, I also doubt that he has the capacity to understand the concept behind it.

As a Red Sox fan with the excellent MLB Extra Innings Package, I often get the chance to listen to Jerry Remy and Don Orsillo (and occasionally Dennis Eckersley, who’s an absolute riot), the regular NESN broadcasters. Though not perfect, the two men do an adequate job at calling the game, and a spectacular job at keeping the viewer entertained. As in-game broadcasters, with a primary concern of calling the game at hand, I don’t expect them to rattle off John Lackey’s FIP or Dustin Pedroia’s Isolated Power—yet, occasionally, they still make an attempt to appeal to the stat heads out there, which is greatly appreciated.

Reynolds and his crew should be making more than an attempt, though, as they are analysts, not play-by-play men, and in today’s increasingly statistics driven game, you can’t speak intelligently about the sport without Sabermetrics.

  • I'm a little surprised that you like Vin Scully. Of course here in LaLa Land, he's next to if not above God. I like him because he has the rhythm of the game but I also like Steve Lyons because of his enthusiasm, and he teaches us about the game of baseball. And after all, how can one not love a guy who dropped his drawers on the field? Anyway, the problem is that the folks we like are broadcasting the game and the ones we don't like are in the studio talking over each other. Do you notice that the two guys in the booth (Scully works alone!) doing the game don't trip over each other, whereas the studio guys talk on top of one another? They're not merely bad, they're superfluous.

    Responses to this comment
  • They're also simply uneducated. Just because someone played baseball doesn't mean they're fit to analyze it. I'd to see Dave Cameron host MLB Tonight for a change. That would sure be a different show!

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment