Splicetoday
Splice Archive
Moving Pictures
Feb 23, 2009, 04:51AM

How To Keep Your Oscar Buzz Going

Aymar Jean Christian

There's a full year before the next Academy Awards, but you can forestall withdrawal symptoms by checking out some of the winners' older work.

Academy awards.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

I have a tendency to short-term nostalgia: right after something is over I'm terribly sad it's gone, then get over it and move on. I rarely see movies more than once, unless they're very entertaining in a popcorn-eating kind of way (I can see most rom-coms and big budget action films many times over; that is all.)

What is an always-nostalgic one-time movie watcher to do? Oscar season 2008 is over, and yet I want to relive it again! But I can't see the movies again! What to do? Here are five easy suggestions:

1) See the movies. Let's be honest, few people can see every Oscar film. I still haven't seen Frost/Nixon and The Wrestler. I could easily prolong Oscar season by seeing these movies. But it feels a little late, right? Like showing up to the party after all the booze is gone.

2) Listen to the music. This is my favorite option. I bought the scores to Milk—had this not been a Slumdog-y year I would've died to see it win—and The Reader—because one of my favorite composers, Nico Muhly, wrote it. A.R. Rahman's Slumdog soundtrack is a hit on iTunes and it's no wonder why. After listening through them all, I felt sufficiently satisfied.

3) Watch the trailers. I love trailers. When well done—which they usually are since they're so expensive to make—they really do give you a sense of film in bite-size pieces. The trailer for Benjamin Button is better than the movie, for example.

4) YouTube your heart out. Or find some shady streaming video of your favorite film and re-watch the memorable moments in the movie of your choice. I'd paste a link or two, but I'm afraid of getting sued.

5) Become an historian. Watch the older films and performances of the directors and actors nominated this year. Nothing could be more riveting than trying to find some sense of continuity in the oeuvre of Gus Van Sant—even the gay ones are random, Mala Noche, My Own Private Idaho, and Milk?—or relive the less-than-sophisticated earlier films of our best actress nominees: The Princess Diaries, Lara Croft Tomb Raider, and Romance and Cigarettes (Winslet is heaven!). Ever heard of Falling in Love? If that doesn't satisfy, track how our supporting actresses got where they are today through sheer versatility: Viola Davis as "strong ghetto mother" in The Architect and Get Rich or Die Tryin'; Penelope Cruz as "strong foxy bombshell" in Volver, Noel and Vanilla Sky; Amy Adams as "slightly vapid innocent young beauty" in Junebug, Enchanted and The Wedding Date.

Or just get over it. Any day now!
Older Moving Pictures
Newer Moving Pictures
Discussion
  • Missing sm

    Alison777

    commented

    I was "over it" a month ago, thank you very much.

    Responses to this comment
  • Victoria beckham 0323.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

    PoMoMad

    commented

    i will respect the oscars when a movie like "prada" or "madea" wins. i'm happy for heath and slumdog, though!

    Responses to this comment
  • Wilson.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

    Timothy

    commented

    I'd watch the Oscars if it were a one-hour presentation, but it's too long and filled with too much self-congratulation. At least the Pulitzers, as rigged as any award extravaganza, isn't televised (I don't think). That said, I got a bit of satisfaction that "Slumdog" won, and was mildly annoyed that Michael Shannon didn't win for "Rev. Road." Although to be truthful, absent the Mumbai terrorist attacks, I doubt "Slumdog" would've had such a banner night, and given Hollywood, I don't think that's an overly cynical view.

    Responses to this comment
  • Ron asheton.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

    Jake L

    commented

    This year was the most predictable Oscars ever. Good for Heath and everything, but overall I didn't care at all about the Oscars this year. Rourke got snubbed, man.

    Responses to this comment
  • Exclamation mark.png?ixlib=rails 2.1

    eureka

    commented

    Gotta go with Jake on this one. Pretty predictable, and by far the best film of 2008 (and of the past decade), Synecdoche, New York, got completely snubbed by the academy. In my world, that film would've had the following categories locked down: Best Picture, Director, Actor, Original Screenplay (this is the one it deserved most of all), Art Direction, and Original Score. I'm still bitter. That film was completely brilliant and it got snubbed by every major awards ceremony. What horseshit. If they can't recognize a brilliant film that's their problem. Oh, I actually do have to disagree with Jake on Rourke getting snubbed. Penn was my choice, he just inhabited that role. Rourke was good, but it seemed like he was playing himself to a certain extent. Penn became someone else.

    Responses to this comment
    In response to
  • Photo 1.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

    atomculture

    commented

    Yes, Penn deserved it -- if not because he completely owned Harvey (if you see the documentary, it's easy to see how much of Milk Penn channeled), than because Milk had no shot of winning Best Picture.

    Responses to this comment
    In response to
  • Missing sm

    SOULEATER

    commented

    You know who really got snubbed, Clint Eastwood. Gran Torino should've been at least nominated for best picture and best original screenplay. Clint also deserved best actor. Frost/Nixon also deserved at least one award, too.

    Responses to this comment
    In response to
Register or Login to leave a comment