Politics & Media
Sep 19, 2008, 05:24AM

Dummies for Democracy

Holding out hope this election—whether for Obama or McCain—ignores the fact that our entire political system needs to be overhauled if we truly want "Change."

I confess. I believe there is a ruling class that sustains the two-party plutocracy running the nation for the benefit of the rich and corporate class. Their broad strategy is deception and delusion. Tactically, they use government, the mainstream media, the financial services sector, funding of politicians and the two major parties, and many other parts of the culture and economy to maintain their power and control.
Elections do not threaten elites. To the contrary, political debate and elections are important to maintain the illusion and delusion of a real democracy. They are key to prevent outright revolution, marginalize dissidents and political reform efforts, and suppress third parties. Would power plutocrats allow election of a president that threatened their control? Of course not. And no Democratic or Republican presidential candidate ever poses a real threat despite cloaking themselves with labels like maverick, reformer or change agent.
If you accept my worldview, then you know that the ruling class would prefer John McCain over Barack Obama, though they can live with Obama, which is why many, many wealthy people and corporations have poured money into Obama's campaign and the recent Democratic convention. The chief disadvantage of Obama and Sarah Palin, from the rulers' perspective, is their relative brief stints as politicians. It takes time to corrupt politicians and cement their dependency on and membership in the ruling class. In contrast, McCain and Joe Biden clearly have shown themselves reliable in protecting the status quo two-party plutocracy.
Why does deception and delusion work so effectively? When it comes to politics, current events and history, the vast majority of citizens are uninformed, stupid and dumb, regardless of their educational level. As distracted and compulsive consumers, they fall head over hills for political lies and slick campaign rhetoric.
First, consider younger voters. There's been so much about the increased interest in this presidential campaign by younger people, especially evident in the Ron Paul and Obama campaigns. But consider these facts, as reported by Rick Shenkman in the Washington Post: For those aged 18 to 29 just 20 percent read newspapers and just 11 percent regularly surf the Internet for news. Most of what people know about candidates' positions on the issues comes from what they learn from unreliable and all too often misleading 30-second commercials. Despite far more widespread and extensive schooling, people today possess no more political knowledge than their parents and grandparents. And don't think that those addicted to The Daily Show and its irreverent view of politics are a lot smarter than those favoring the conservative O'Reilly Factor. In both groups, only about 54 percent of the shows' politicized viewers scored in the high knowledge category.
Propaganda and misinformation really work. Just prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq some 60 percent of Americans believed that Iraq was behind the 9/11 attack. But here is the kicker: A year later there was a wealth of information, including the 9/11 Commission report, saying that Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack. Yet an amazing 50 percent of Americans still believed that Iraq was to blame, and may still think so. As Rick Shenkman, author of Just How Stupid Are We?: Facing the Truth About the American Voter, concluded: "By every measure social scientists have devised, voters are spectacularly uninformed." Guess who takes advantage of the stupidity of voters, especially younger ones.
If people can believe Obama when he says that the election is not about him but about them, then they can also believe McCain when he says he is a proven change agent and reformer.
The only real difference between Obama and McCain is exactly how they will screw the public and benefit the rich and powerful if elected, not whether they will. If the electorate were really intelligent, they would understand and focus on the similarity between the two, rather than their professed differences. It is what they share—obedience and loyalty to the two-party plutocracy—that matters the most. As long as voters do not understand this, the oppression and destruction of the middle class will continue, despite people thinking they are free and live in a democracy.
Mostly, Americans are free to remain vulnerable to deception and delusion.
Democracy for dummies is what we have and what the majority deserves. For the rest of us the difficult challenge is to find ways to fight the political system that are not marginalized and only satisfy our egos. As long as you are an enthusiastic supporter of any Democrat or Republican you are a willing participant in our fake democracy. Most voters persist in believing in the myth that some Democrat or Republican can and will reform the political system, fix the economy, and restore American democracy. They refuse to face the painful truth that this is simply not true. They rather keep embracing the delusional myth.
Consider these wise words of John F. Kennedy: "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate, contrived, and dishonest, but the myth—persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
And so millions of Americans suffering from habitual stupidity will cast their votes confident that they have discovered the truth. Like the march of the penguins diving into icy water without thinking they have any other choice, they succumb to the big myth that this year cost about $1 billion to keep alive. These voters are dummies for democracy. The rest of us will vote for Ralph Nader or some other third party candidate, or refuse to vote at all, and seek ways to ignite the Second American Revolution.
Politicians and media people often praise the smart public and smart voters as if they inevitably make the best, most intelligent and informed electoral decisions. This is sheer hype designed to maintain the political status quo. There is only one smart fact: Every single Democrat and Republican candidate lies. Why do they keep lying? It works.

  • Who knew that Ralph Nader's ghostwriter was going public. Seriously, when he says that the ruling elite is a *little* bit worried about Obama because he hasn't been a politician for long, and therefore not corrupted to the extent of McCain and Biden (I'll leave out Palin right now), I think he misses it. Any pol who can organize millions to his campaign, set fundraising records and defeat an establishment candidate like Hillary Clinton is NOT inexperienced.

    Responses to this comment
  • Joel, this is not a democracy. Your title is just as deceptive and harmful as the two party system you deride. Before you can fix a system, and I agree that the current form of government is a joke, you first need to identify what exists. Although you make a common argument, it is fundementally flawed by your lack of understanding of the true myth called democracy.

    Responses to this comment
  • To the Landlord: Like so many other misinformed people you apparently think that just because the US is a republic that it is not also a democracy. It is you that are totally wrong. True, we do not have a pure democracy, but we definitely have a form of democracy, and even some examples of what is called direct democracy; for example, whenever you vote for a ballot initiative, measure or referendum that creates a law or establishes an official government action or position - that is direct democracy, where citizens, not their representatives, are like lawmakers. The real mystery is why so many people like you want to keep believing that we do not have a government structure that is both a republic and democracy. You should read my book Delusional Democracy to make up for your obvious poor formal education.

    Responses to this comment
  • statusqoubuster, by your own admission, the U.S. is NOT a democracy. You can bastardize and qualify terms as long as you like i.e "direct democracy" but the simple fact is that once you say it is both or a "form of democracy" you lost the argument. If humans evolved from apes, that does not mean that modern day man is an ape. Perhaps, what the U.S. is is some retarded interpretation of the original, but, Democracy it aint. Why don't you read my book "When Idiots Attack" I think it is right up your alley.

    Responses to this comment
  • Joel, isn't the full title of your book " Delusional Democracy - Fixing The REPUBLIC Without Overthrowing The Government " ? If so, your title says it all.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment