<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<post>
  <body>&lt;p&gt;A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, the evil Empire - we'll
call it Hollywood - was waging war against the Rebel forces known as
independent filmmakers. It was a long and bitter fight, but even
rebels, apparently, can't resist the temptation of lucrative
merchandising deals and a well-stocked Kraft service table. A
hundred-odd years into the struggle, it seems independent filmmakers
are no more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This hard fact has been more than evident in the past few years.
Walking into any local &quot;independent theater,&quot; a patron is immediately
greeted by movie posters for films about as independent from the
Hollywood system as Tibet is from China. Take, for example, the recent
Academy Award winner &quot;Juno.&quot; Now, we all loved &quot;Juno&quot; (right?). It was
cute, quirky and, most importantly, edgy without being offensive - a
true hallmark of modern indie features. But it wasn't truly
independent. &quot;Juno&quot; was distributed by Fox Searchlight, a subsidiary of
20th Century Fox. Calling anything owned by 20th Century Fox
&quot;independent&quot; is about as contradictory as you get. But that didn't
stop the Film Independent's Spirit Awards from showering &quot;Juno&quot; with
awards - the industry equivalent of the Grammys giving a Best New
Artist nomination to Feist, even though she'd been releasing albums for
years. Oh wait - they just did that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
				&lt;img alt=&quot;Walters_medium&quot; src=&quot;http://www.splicetoday.com/vault/posts/0000/0637/walters_medium.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;/vault/posts/0000/0637/walters_medium.jpg&quot;&gt;
			&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems like there really isn't a true independent movement in
cinema anymore. Many people point to the fact that Hollywood has always
dominated the American film market, but there's always been an
underground movement to counteract it. From the surrealism of Maya
Deren's shorts (&quot;Meshes of the Afternoon&quot;) to the doo-wop-infused
insanity of Kenneth Anger (&quot;Scorpio Rising&quot;), fringe filmmakers have
always been eager to cast their damning eyes - and rigid middle fingers
- to the frothy banality of mainstream Hollywood.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the most well-respected American filmmakers of the 20th
Century, for example, was John Cassavetes, perhaps the definition of an
independent filmmaker. Cassavetes worked with established actors,
screened his films at all the famous festivals and was nominated for
Oscars, but he did it all while working outside of the system. And when
he did work in Hollywood, it was to make money to use on his subsequent
underground projects, such as &quot;A Woman Under the Influence&quot; (1974) or
&quot;Opening Night&quot; (1977), most of which were shot in true guerrilla style
on the streets of L.A. and New York.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other filmmakers, like Robert Downey Jr. and Russ Meyer, used
similar tactics to churn out their own highly personal, and not always
commercial, pet projects. These kinds of filmmakers still exist today,
but what they lack is both exposure and organization.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's where the Ann Arbor Film Festival comes in. While most, ahem,
&quot;indie&quot; filmmakers are making sappy, streamlined junk, certain artists
are still willing to go out on a limb and make films that are truly
audacious and irreverent. This is something to be celebrated. Even if
80 percent of the short avant-garde films on display over the course of
the next week make absolutely no sense to you, simply admire the fact
that these filmmakers are trying to startle you, motivate you or, at
the very least, get some kind of honest reaction out of you, something
most commercial films today seem unwilling to do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And while we're at it, let's give these so-called independent films
a new name, shall we? Because they're not independent films - they're
&quot;alternative&quot; films. They're safe films that make people think they're
watching something audacious simply because they're slightly skewered
from the typical Hollywood mindset of babes and bombs. But don't fool
yourself: They're just as calculated, just as manipulative and often
just as dishonest as any of those silly action movies many people claim
to hate for the same reasons.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
  <byline>Brandon Conradis</byline>
  <cached-tag-list>juno ellen page indie independent film cinema movies sell out corporate fox</cached-tag-list>
  <caption>&lt;p&gt;ABC&lt;/p&gt;</caption>
  <category>the-feed</category>
  <comments-count type="integer">4</comments-count>
  <created-at type="datetime">2008-03-25T09:10:27-04:00</created-at>
  <deck>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Independent film&quot; used to meaningfully describe movies free from major corporate influence. Now it doesn't mean a damn thing. From &lt;em&gt;The Michigan Daily&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</deck>
  <department-id type="integer">4</department-id>
  <feature type="boolean" nil="true"></feature>
  <id type="integer">260</id>
  <permalink>look-it-s-one-of-those-i-indie-i-movies</permalink>
  <position type="integer" nil="true"></position>
  <publish-date type="datetime">2008-03-25T09:12:13-04:00</publish-date>
  <published type="boolean">true</published>
  <screamer type="boolean">false</screamer>
  <show-topper-image-on-homepage type="boolean">true</show-topper-image-on-homepage>
  <sticky type="boolean">false</sticky>
  <subtitle></subtitle>
  <tab-feature type="boolean">false</tab-feature>
  <title>Look, It's One of Those &lt;i&gt;Indie&lt;/i&gt; Movies!</title>
  <topper-image nil="true"></topper-image>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2008-09-18T04:45:21-04:00</updated-at>
  <url>http://media.www.michigandaily.com/media/storage/paper851/news/2008/03/25/Film/Exposure.For.The.Unexposed-3281568.shtml</url>
  <user-id type="integer">11</user-id>
  <view-count type="integer">153</view-count>
</post>
