Politics & Media
Nov 10, 2008, 04:44AM

Bush Begat Obama

Obama ran a great campaign, but we also have Bush II to thank for preparing the electorate for this moment.

Bush.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

George W. Bush has often said that he doesn’t worry about what his legacy as president will be and that he’ll leave it for historians to decide. Many people view this as humble. Perhaps this is cynical, but I’ve always viewed it as a disguised cockiness—to me, it’s a bit presumptuous to think that he will even have some sort of a political legacy, and that his legacy will be the subject of rich historical debate. Most bad presidents don’t really have a legacy worth noting, other than just being a bad president. I don’t think many historians sit around debating the legacy of Warren G. Harding’s presidency, except to say, “Yes, President Harding did state, ‘I am not fit for this office and should never have been here’ shortly before curling up in the fetal position on the Oval Office floor and urinating on himself.  His pee-pants legacy lives on.”

Luckily, we don’t have to wait a long time to understand how history will view George W. Bush, because last Tuesday, we figured out what his legacy will be: Barack Obama.  

That’s right, Abraham begat Isaac, Isaac begat Jacob, and Dubya begat Obama.

I’ve been a supporter of Obama for president since his convention speech in 2004, so I’m not trying to say that he did not earn this win on his own. In his recent article on this site, Andrew Sargus Klein accurately pointed out that in 2004 people were clearly voting against Bush rather than for Kerry, no matter how much we denied it at the time.  Ironically, John McCain structured his campaign and his rhetoric such that it seemed like a vote for him was simply a vote against Obama.

Now, one might think that it sounds racist to say that Bush did such a poor job as president that Americans actually elected a black man, but truthfully that statement simply acknowledges our country’s struggle with the issue of race. Consider that in 2004, a significant amount of the country was already sick of Bush, and yet the majority of Americans still felt that a mild-mannered, rich, white war hero was too risky. Cut to four years later, and the country resoundingly elected an African-American 47-year-old with a history of drug use and a spooky, Muslim-y name. If you took a poll in 2004 asking people if they could picture an African-American being elected president, most people would say yes—after all, we’re familiar with The Fifth Element, Deep Impact and 24. But even in 2004 there had only been one popularly elected black governor in the history of the United States. And while all signs pointed to a Democratic victory this year, would the American people have elected Al Sharpton? Of course not—it was the combination of a particular political climate and a particular candidate that resulted in an African-American being elected president.

However, it’s not just the race factor that leads me to feel that Bush’s legacy is the election of Obama. Many traits of the two individuals seem to be diametrically opposed. I can’t help but feel like America elected Obama because he is the antithesis of Bush in many ways:

—Obama was a professor; Bush was a C student and the guy cheating off your test.

—Obama is Mr. Smooth; Bush is Mr. Choked on a Pretzel.

—Obama was a basketball player; Bush was a cheerleader.

—Obama seems, more often than not, to know the perfect thing to say; Bush seems, more often then not, to not know what he’s saying.

—Obama put pressure on advisors and aides to resign when they came under fire from the media or screwed up during the campaign; Bush said, “Brownie, you’re doing a heckuva of a job.”

—Bush couldn’t capture Osama bin Laden; Obama actually pals around with terrorists.

—Bush did cocaine; Obama… okay, they both did cocaine. I’ll give you that one.

I’m sure I’ll catch flack for insinuating that Bush is terrible, and Obama is perfect, even though that’s not what I’m suggesting. However, such a reaction would be consistent with the large wave of Bush apologist articles I’ve been seeing lately. All of these articles have the same basic gist: Bush is actually a really nice guy who has been vilified and misunderstood, and all those Republican scandals were what ruined the party and not the Bush administration. But wait a second, isn’t this the party that believes strongly in trickle-down policies? And yes, I’m sure Bush is really nice guy; anybody who says otherwise is an idiot who doesn’t even know the President anyway. But for the last time, being a drinking buddy has nothing to do with being president—all that matters is how you lead. George W. Bush led poorly, and whether he wanted it to be his legacy or not, the election of Barack Obama will always be remembered as partly a reaction to his eight years in office.

  • http://www.wikiality.com/Warren_G._Harding

    Responses to this comment
  • Sorry to wrangle with you, Phil, but Bush will have a legacy, for better or worse. A lot really depends on future historians, and what their ideology is. Pardon the repetition, but people should remember how reviled Harry Truman was when he left office. And Herbert Hoover, blamed for the Great Depression, was, after his relief efforts after WWII, was one of the most admired Americans.

    Responses to this comment
  • I agree totally with Philip Medley. After eight disastrous years, the best thing Bush did was essentially elect Barack Obama.

    Responses to this comment
  • Medley's entirely correct. No one will remember Bush in 40 or 50 years, except for all the havoc he created.

    Responses to this comment
  • "No legacy", that is the funniest thing you have written yet. Granted, it will be a bad one, but he will have one. 2 wars with an idea (terrorism) not a country; the re-writing of disclosure laws; lack of adherence to the constitution; 9/11; market collapse, need I go on? I also think you give Bush too much credit for the Obama win. What about beating the Clinton machine? Was that because of Bush as well?

    Responses to this comment
  • It was really a perfect confluence of events and circumstances (Bush 43, the tumbling economy, Iraq, Katrina, McCain's messy campaign and Obama's brilliant machine) that led to Barry's victory. With any luck, he'll run an equally brilliant cabinet and country.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment