Go to comment.

Texan

May 18, 2013, 10:22AM

I didn't need to offend and I apologize, I shou...

I didn't need to offend and I apologize, I should have said uninformed instead of ignorant. My main 3 points are thus 1. woman who has an annual gyno visit, should have been informed of this gene study at least 5-10 years ago. My sisters, whose mother died of ovarian cancer, got the test around 10 years ago. Jolie herself talked about this over 5 years ago and said how she planned to proceed sometime in the future. This is not new or not widely distributed information. It is more a sign of media's short term memory. 2. Most women can not afford the test and following reconstructive surgery. Because Jolie can, does not increase it's availability to the masses. She is not talking about this but her own personal struggle. Not sure that since she had to tell the media instead of them finding out, that her struggle is really at all relevant to those who would have much more permanent and possibly obvious scarring. 3. In light of 1 & 2, what has Jolie written that will help or demonstrates courage or adds to the conversation? When informed and productive, I love celebrity involvement in worthy causes. When the celebrity is the primary beneficiary? , just think of the book offers, interviews etc., not so much.
Responses to this comment
Respond to comment

Flag
Go to comment.

Noah Berlatsky

May 17, 2013, 09:56PM

It seems silly to appeal to an objective reason...

It seems silly to appeal to an objective reason when we're talking about fairly complicated cultural codes. There's room for differences in interpretation. I've been thinking about "be a lady" more. If you fail to be a man, it generally means you're unmanly; i.e., a woman. If you fail to be a lady, it often means that you're a slut, or a bitch; still gendered, but not classy. re, 4; Jolie and a NYT op ed are going to get a lot more publicity than virtually anything else. I still don't see why that's a bad thing. Insulting me or my knowledge is not a very effective or thoughtful argument as to why it's a bad thing. 3. It sure sounds like antipathy to me. And saying that Jolie seems to have done a good thing overall doesn't seem like especially undue credit. I don't think she's a saint; I think she wrote a decent op ed for a good cause. 2. I never said anything different. Not sure what your'e getting at with this one... and I already answered 1. And for 5; get over yourself, man.
Responses to this comment
Respond to comment

Flag
Go to comment.

JMurray

May 17, 2013, 04:15PM

Egyptian buddy once confided, "Gum is my enemy....

Egyptian buddy once confided, "Gum is my enemy." In time, it was mine too, pulling out vintage fillings, one more habit I couldn't sustain. Yet who could resist bubble gum named for a tank-killer? Not me when Ike was in the White House and Superman was on the cusp of complexity.
Responses to this comment
Respond to comment

Flag

More Comments

Splice Archive

Sometimes You Embarrass Your Kid Just By Existing
J. Lo's Vapid, Half-Cougar Spectacle Continues Unabated
Femininity Is Still About Bodies

Sometimes You Embarrass Your Kid Just By ExistingI agreed to chaperone the high school marching ...

J. Lo's Vapid, Half-Cougar Spectacle Continues Unabated "Live It Up" is Jennifer Lopez's third collabo...

Femininity Is Still About Bodies "Angelina Jolie Is Still A Woman," announ...

About Splice

Pop CultureJan 11, 2013, 08:17AM

What Year Is It (42)?

Clues:

“Brown Sugar” and the treacly “Imagine” are hits; Lance Armstrong is born & Coco Chanel dies; A Clockwork Orange and The Last Picture Show are released; All in The Family debuts on CBS; Bill White becomes the first black baseball TV announcer; and Amtrak begins operation.

DISCUSSION

Go to comment.

Texan

Jan 11, 2013, 11:40AM

This one is too easy!!! It is the year of the ...

This one is too easy!!! It is the year of the incredibly handsome young man.
Responses to this comment
Respond to comment

Flag

Add a comment